FOOLIN' AROUND – AT 8:57 A.M. ET:  The climate religionists are back in town, but this time they're getting some flak.  You've read that there hasn't been any "global warming" in about 17 years, which appears to be true.  But that didn't fit the narrative of the Obamans and the religious warmers, so last week the administration came out with new "findings" that claim there hasn't been any pause.  Not so fast, guys.  From Fox: 

Until last week, government data on climate change indicated that the Earth has warmed over the last century, but that the warming slowed dramatically and even stopped at points over the last 17 years.

But a paper released May 28 by researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has readjusted the data in a way that makes the reduction in warming disappear, indicating a steady increase in temperature instead. But the study’s readjusted data conflict with many other climate measurements, including data taken by satellites, and some climate scientists aren’t buying the new claim.

“While I’m sure this latest analysis from NOAA will be regarded as politically useful for the Obama administration, I don’t regard it as a particularly useful contribution to our scientific understanding of what is going on,” Judith Curry, a climate science professor at Georgia Tech, wrote in a response to the study.

And in an interview, Curry told FoxNews.com that that the adjusted data doesn’t match other independent measures of temperature.

“The new NOAA dataset disagrees with a UK dataset, which is generally regarded as the gold standard for global sea surface temperature datasets,” she said. “The new dataset also disagrees with ARGO buoys and satellite analyses.”

COMMENT:  Eisenhower, in his farewell address to the nation – the famous and famously misquoted "industrial-military complex" address – warned about the impact of government grants on scientific results.  In effect, he predicted the pressure to "go along" that these grants bring, and, by extension, that federal employment can bring.  I'm not making charges.  Just sayin'.

If this were a theoretical debate, it wouldn't be that significant.  But the climate-change religionists are demanding trillions of dollars to "fight" climate change, funds that could be used for other noble purposes.  Before one check is written, I want to see a lot more actual proof, and I'm not seeing it.

June 10,  2015